• State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Answers 2 answers
  • Subscribers 27 subscribers
  • Views 3323 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Read Only Repositories...

jhoward
over 6 years ago

Hello, 

 

We are looking for an offsite cloud solution to duplicate data backed up through Rapid Recovery on our local NAS.  Seems replication with a cloud VM is the way to go but costs could be significant. If we went with Amazon S3 for read-only archiving, can we still recover data from these archives?  

I guess what I'm really asking is  what is the main reason to go with a cloud VM for replication verses just archiving the data if it can still be recovered?  Is it just the retention policy? 

Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

Parents
  • 0 over 6 years ago
    Awesome! Thanks for the great information. The integration with Amazon Glacier sounds promising and a good route take. While waiting for the new release, we will set up an archive so we can have data protected offsite for the time being. Thanks again!
Reply
  • 0 over 6 years ago
    Awesome! Thanks for the great information. The integration with Amazon Glacier sounds promising and a good route take. While waiting for the new release, we will set up an archive so we can have data protected offsite for the time being. Thanks again!
Children
No Data