Data Moves with Purpose: Build the Foundation for AI

You're already ahead: your stack, your skills, your speed.

But a smarter foundation means less rework, faster AI results and a platform that’s ready to grow with you.

Don’t just move fast - move smart.

Because what you build now will power AI, analytics and innovation for years to come.

Download eBook

The Playbook Common Pitfalls FAQs

Common Pitfalls in Data Migrations

Dark Data – Poor Organization & Governance

Security and Compliance Risks

Lack of a Clear Use Case

Performance & Cost Challenges

Integration Issues

Dark Data – Poor Organization & Governance

Dark data can inflate migrations with irrelevant or outdated information, increasing costs, slowing performance, and hiding critical insights. Without strong data governance, organizations risk carrying over security vulnerabilities, compliance issues, and inefficiencies into the new system.

Failure to implement role-based access or encryption strategies can leave critical data exposed. Often sensitive data is stored without proper classification or access controls, increasing rick of breach or regulatory violations.

Rushing into modernized data structure without defining clear business objectives leads to wasted resources. Without a defined roadmap of how data will be used (e.g. analytics, AI, real-time decision-making), the data lake becomes an expensive dumping ground

Migrating vast amounts of data without optimization leads to inefficiencies – querying unstructured data at scale can slow analytics and inflate storage costs. Additionally, poor indexing, duplicate data and excessive redundancy can increase costs without adding value.

Legacy systems can struggle to interact with modern data lakes, creating silos instead of a unified ecosystem. Without standardizing before migration, compatibility issues arise and can require expensive post-migration fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions

I can migrate into the data lake without modeling. Why do I need a modeling solution?

Transitioning from legacy systems to a modern data lake is complex and error prone. This framework adds structure and safeguards to your migration - preserving data integrity, consistency, and security throughout the process. This avoids operational disruptions and saves time compared to a direct, unassisted move.

Why can’t I just move fast and fix it later?

“Modeling is your DevOps moment. Skip it now, and you’ll be rebuilding later.”

Most teams move fast out of necessity, falling back on familiar tools and skipping modeling or platform planning to meet deadlines. But short-term speed leads to long-term rework, tech debt and fragile pipelines.

Just like DevOps was once seen as a “nice to have,” data modeling has been deprioritized in the rush to deliver. Today, though, your data lake isn’t just a storage layer - it’s the backbone of analytics, governance and AI. Without modeling, you're building pipelines that don’t scale, platforms that can’t evolve and AI that underperforms.

Why is real-time data replication essential for a data lake strategy?

Traditional ETL processes typically run in scheduled batches, which can create lag between when your data is generated and when it’s available for analysis. This delay can limit the usefulness of your data lake for real-time analytics or AI-driven workloads.

Real-time replication helps keep your data lake continuously in sync with operational systems, ensuring that changes are captured as they happen. It’s especially valuable when working with large data volumes or high-throughput environments where minimizing latency is critical.

Can I track data quality, pipeline performance and system usage after migration?

Yes. This framework includes tools for monitoring ingestion rates, pipeline performance and system usage. By making data movement observable, teams can identify slowdowns, usage spikes, or pipeline failures early - and continuously optimize for reliability and scale.

How does this help me get to AI faster?

AI needs clean, consistent and timely data. Modeling before migration brings clarity to structure, semantics and lineage - removing roadblocks for AI teams. With fewer quality issues and more reusable data assets, development cycles are faster and more predictable.

Can I still show fast wins to the business?

Yes. A smarter foundation doesn’t delay results - it enables faster, more confident iteration.

For example, instead of hardcoding a one-off pipeline for a specific dashboard, this framework encourages modeling the data domain once and reusing it across teams. That means when the business asks for a new report or a machine learning feature, the data is already structured, governed and ready to go.

It’s the difference between building quick fixes and building momentum. Quick wins don’t have to come at the cost of long-term stability.

How do I know if I’m ready for AI-scale operations?

Readiness isn’t just about storage or compute - it's about structure, trust and traceability. If the current platform lacks lineage, governance or reusable models, it will struggle under AI-scale demands. This framework helps close those gaps before they become blockers.

Can I demonstrate clear return on investment and value to the business?

Yes - but only with the right visibility. A complete monitoring framework should track not just performance but also cost impact.

For example, Foglight for Snowflake shows which users, queries and warehouses are driving costs - including inefficient queries that consume the most credits or underutilized warehouses with memory spillage or long queue times. It can even surface trends like weekly usage growth rates or pinpoint expensive workloads frozen in staging.

By tying technical behavior to business spend, this framework helps teams identify optimization opportunities and clearly demonstrate savings or efficiency gains - whether it’s cost per query, warehouse right-sizing or extending the runway of a Snowflake contract.