This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Creating Large Repository - Multiple locations or turn off write caching policy?

Just installed Rapid Recovery 6.1 on Windows Server 2016.  Have 18.6TB of disk, wanted to create an 18TB repository. The error I'm receiving says you can't exceed 16TB with write caching policy on (and yes, I know I have to increase the cluster size). Saw that the recommended setting for Windows 2016 is to leave write caching on.

So I'm confused. Do I leave caching on and create two 9TB locations (example K:\Repo1\Loc1 and K:\Repo1\Loc2) to get 18TB repository?  That seems silly to me.  Do I turn caching off and create a 18TB repository?  Which doesn't seem right either.

Parents
  • Hi aeibl:
    This is something new. Windows 2008R2 had a 16TB repository size limitation, but we did not see any issues since.
    I would suggest to attempt creating the repository with the cache disabled, see if it is possible and please let us know.
    The issue you experience may be caused by some driver/hardware/policy limitation that we are not aware of. Your (in)ability to create a functional repository with the cache disabled may be an indication of it.
    If it works, unlike Tim, I am not opposed to running RapidRecovery with the write caching disabled. It all depends on the specifics of your environment and of the load on the system. Running a system with multiple repository extents increases the resource consumption and requires increasing the effective size of the dedupe cache which you may or may not afford.
    (Speaking of the dedupe cache -- I recommend a smaller dedupe cache on systems which are slow or have a chance of failure, to reduce the time it takes the cache to be flushed to disk and diminish the overall chances of repository corruption)
Reply
  • Hi aeibl:
    This is something new. Windows 2008R2 had a 16TB repository size limitation, but we did not see any issues since.
    I would suggest to attempt creating the repository with the cache disabled, see if it is possible and please let us know.
    The issue you experience may be caused by some driver/hardware/policy limitation that we are not aware of. Your (in)ability to create a functional repository with the cache disabled may be an indication of it.
    If it works, unlike Tim, I am not opposed to running RapidRecovery with the write caching disabled. It all depends on the specifics of your environment and of the load on the system. Running a system with multiple repository extents increases the resource consumption and requires increasing the effective size of the dedupe cache which you may or may not afford.
    (Speaking of the dedupe cache -- I recommend a smaller dedupe cache on systems which are slow or have a chance of failure, to reduce the time it takes the cache to be flushed to disk and diminish the overall chances of repository corruption)
Children
No Data