This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SQL Attachability & Snapshots

Hi All,

A two-parter on a 2008r2 server running an instance of SQL that we are backing up.

1) I think I generally understand the attachability check concept but we do not have a full install to test it against not can I really justify purchasing one for the task. The software that uses it on the server in question was a bundled package for document management. It may or may not work to check itself but so far I haven't tried it. How important is this step? All the backup flag as yellow (unchecked). How often does it really need to be done? If it is critical what do you do if it fails?

2) This same server seems to snapshot every night after roll-up time regardless of the schedule I set it at. This is the only server in the lot that does this but it is the only one that has SQL on it. Is this triggered somehow by the roll-up or is it by default or what? It seems like this behavior is not by design.

Thanks.

Parents
  • Rollup. This maybe related to log truncation (nightly job) vs rollup? Log truncation will only run after a successful backup. For example, if you force a log truncation job from the GUI, a backup will kick off then perform truncation after.

    Attachability. The benefits of this feature are questionable to me. If you have a critical SQL application(s) then making sure the attachability check is done probably makes sense. But if its not critical, then paying for a full sql install probably wont make sense.

    You can use a remote SQL for attachability but this causes its own issues (performance)

    Attachability does not do any deep scan of the SQL data. It simply tries to attach the DB to SQL to see if this basic (but important) step can be done. Its possible for SQL to run and backup just fine but contain some inconsistency that will cause the attach process to fail. You can typically fix this by running some sql maintenance commands against the DB but if you were running attachability, you would know before hand this was an issue and could fix the DB before there was an issue.
Reply
  • Rollup. This maybe related to log truncation (nightly job) vs rollup? Log truncation will only run after a successful backup. For example, if you force a log truncation job from the GUI, a backup will kick off then perform truncation after.

    Attachability. The benefits of this feature are questionable to me. If you have a critical SQL application(s) then making sure the attachability check is done probably makes sense. But if its not critical, then paying for a full sql install probably wont make sense.

    You can use a remote SQL for attachability but this causes its own issues (performance)

    Attachability does not do any deep scan of the SQL data. It simply tries to attach the DB to SQL to see if this basic (but important) step can be done. Its possible for SQL to run and backup just fine but contain some inconsistency that will cause the attach process to fail. You can typically fix this by running some sql maintenance commands against the DB but if you were running attachability, you would know before hand this was an issue and could fix the DB before there was an issue.
Children
No Data