Multiple Coexistence Manager behind a loadbalancer

Hi there,

a customer of us is in the process of a Notes to Exchange migration. In general it is working fine, but the customer mentioned that the Coexistence Manager's cpu utilization is always to high due to the high amount of freebusy requests and mail flow between Notes and Exchange.

They already setup a second Coexistence Manager server, but the question is now, what would be the best practise to implement both together behind a loadbalancer?

Kind regards,

woelki

Parents
  • First off, not installing everything on a single server is best practice for production.  From your description, separating the free/busy processes and mail to separate servers would be a good start.  Both the mail and exchange to note f/b can be protocol load balanced very easily. In fact just separating the processes to separate servers might be enough for your impamanetation 

Reply
  • First off, not installing everything on a single server is best practice for production.  From your description, separating the free/busy processes and mail to separate servers would be a good start.  Both the mail and exchange to note f/b can be protocol load balanced very easily. In fact just separating the processes to separate servers might be enough for your impamanetation 

Children
No Data